TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Written Language Competence and Pragmatics in Students at Risk of Reading Disability in Oman Using Teacher Report Data
AU - Alkaf, Fatma
AU - Emam, Mahmoud Mohamed
AU - Almehrizi, Rashid
AU - Kazem, Ali Mahdi
AU - Troia, Gary A.
AU - Al-Bulushi, Muna
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by a grant from The Deanship of Research at Sultan Qaboos University, The Sultanate of Oman, under grant number RF/EDU/PSYC/23/02
Publisher Copyright:
© Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2023.
PY - 2023/3/17
Y1 - 2023/3/17
N2 - This study investigated whether teachers’ observations of pragmatic language competence predict literacy skills (and the reverse) in students referred for reading disabilities in Oman. A sample of 574 at-risk children between 7 and 12 years old participated. Teachers rated students’ pragmatic language, reading, and written expression. Results showed (a) teachers rated female students significantly higher in all three areas, while ratings were not different across grades; (b) relationships between pragmatics and literacy skills were significantly stronger for girls than for boys; (c) after controlling for gender and grade, pragmatic language competence accounted for significant unique variance in both reading and written expression; and (d) after controlling for gender and grade, reading and writing both contributed significant unique variance to pragmatic skills, and the standardized regression coefficients suggested stronger effects of literacy skills on pragmatics than pragmatics on literacy skills. Implications for school professionals and future research directions are discussed.
AB - This study investigated whether teachers’ observations of pragmatic language competence predict literacy skills (and the reverse) in students referred for reading disabilities in Oman. A sample of 574 at-risk children between 7 and 12 years old participated. Teachers rated students’ pragmatic language, reading, and written expression. Results showed (a) teachers rated female students significantly higher in all three areas, while ratings were not different across grades; (b) relationships between pragmatics and literacy skills were significantly stronger for girls than for boys; (c) after controlling for gender and grade, pragmatic language competence accounted for significant unique variance in both reading and written expression; and (d) after controlling for gender and grade, reading and writing both contributed significant unique variance to pragmatic skills, and the standardized regression coefficients suggested stronger effects of literacy skills on pragmatics than pragmatics on literacy skills. Implications for school professionals and future research directions are discussed.
KW - Oman
KW - pragmatic language
KW - reading
KW - reading disability
KW - written expression
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150861738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85150861738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/372bd93d-bff5-31af-85d7-c7913ab9159c/
U2 - 10.1177/15257401231160700
DO - 10.1177/15257401231160700
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85150861738
SN - 1525-7401
JO - Communication Disorders Quarterly
JF - Communication Disorders Quarterly
ER -