Wilson's disease: Diagnostic errors and clinical implications

L. K. Prashanth, A. B. Taly*, S. Sinha, G. R. Arunodaya, H. S. Swamy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

88 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Therapeutic outcome of Wilson's disease (WD) significantly depends upon its early recognition. However, because of its rarity in community and protean manifestations, the diagnosis and treatment are often delayed. Aim: To ascertain diagnostic errors at initial evaluation in these patients. Methods: Analysis of medical records of 307 patients of WD registered over 30 years was done regarding presenting manifestations, initial diagnostic omissions, and interval between onset of symptoms to diagnosis and treatment. Results: Of the 307 patients of WD diagnostic errors by referring doctors from different specialties of health care were detected in 192 patients. These were diverse and multiple and included schizophrenia, juvenile polyarthritis, rheumatic chorea, nephrotic syndrome, metachromatic leucodystrophy, congenital myopathies, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, neurodegenerative disease among others. The mean (SD) delay was two (three) years (range: 0.08-30 years). Some of the interventions before establishment of correct diagnosis were electroconvulsive therapy, thalamotomy, antipsychotics, and surgical correction for bony deformity. While 98 patients were referred with correct diagnosis, only 16 were given specific treatment. Conclusion: Awareness among health professionals about varied presenting features of WD and high index of suspicion may have prognostic implications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)907-909
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'Wilson's disease: Diagnostic errors and clinical implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this