TY - JOUR
T1 - Volatility forecasting, downside risk, and diversification benefits of Bitcoin and oil and international commodity markets
T2 - A comparative analysis with yellow metal
AU - Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed
AU - Mensi, Walid
AU - Al-Jarrah, Idries Mohammad Wanas
AU - Hamdi, Atef
AU - Kang, Sang Hoon
N1 - Funding Information:
The last author acknowledges financial support from the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF- 2017S1A5A8019204 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - This study examines the diversification and hedging properties of Bitcoin (BTC) and gold assets for oil and S&P GSCI investors. We model and forecast the volatility performance of the pairs BTC–oil, gold–oil, BTC–S&P GSCI, and gold–GSCI using five bivariate DCC-GARCH family models, two popular forecasting measures (MSE and MAE), the Diebold and Mariano (1995) test, and different risk measures (value-at-risk, expected shortfall, semivariance, and regret) for different portfolios. We find that BTC and gold provide diversification benefits for oil and S&P GSCI. Moreover, by comparing the fitting and forecast performances of the five GARCH models, we find that the standard GARCH model is the best for the gold–oil and BTC–S&P GSCI pairs, while the HYGARCH model is the best for the BTC–oil and gold–S&P GSCI pairs regardless of the time horizon. Finally, we find strong evidence of hedging effectiveness and downside risk reductions, confirming the importance of BTC and gold in oil and S&P GSCI portfolio management.
AB - This study examines the diversification and hedging properties of Bitcoin (BTC) and gold assets for oil and S&P GSCI investors. We model and forecast the volatility performance of the pairs BTC–oil, gold–oil, BTC–S&P GSCI, and gold–GSCI using five bivariate DCC-GARCH family models, two popular forecasting measures (MSE and MAE), the Diebold and Mariano (1995) test, and different risk measures (value-at-risk, expected shortfall, semivariance, and regret) for different portfolios. We find that BTC and gold provide diversification benefits for oil and S&P GSCI. Moreover, by comparing the fitting and forecast performances of the five GARCH models, we find that the standard GARCH model is the best for the gold–oil and BTC–S&P GSCI pairs, while the HYGARCH model is the best for the BTC–oil and gold–S&P GSCI pairs regardless of the time horizon. Finally, we find strong evidence of hedging effectiveness and downside risk reductions, confirming the importance of BTC and gold in oil and S&P GSCI portfolio management.
KW - Bitcoin
KW - Commodity markets
KW - Downside risk
KW - Forecasting
KW - Multivariate GARCH models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064264494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064264494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.najef.2019.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.najef.2019.04.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85064264494
SN - 1062-9408
VL - 49
SP - 104
EP - 120
JO - North American Journal of Economics and Finance
JF - North American Journal of Economics and Finance
ER -