Abstract
This article deals with an essential part of Islamic law usually referred to as siyar. It discusses the development of siyar in an Islamic context and in comparison to the development of the modern law of nations. It further follows up the evaluation of siyar in the Western literature and analyses recurring paradigms of categorisation used in this literature. The author discusses Kruse's (1979) approach to differentiate between an "Islamic" and a "Muslim" law of nations. As case studies of argumentative weaknesses and loopholes, the author scrutinizes the attempts to attribute siyar to a particular type of law of nations and to render it as a legal order of either personal or territorial validity. The article focuses on methodological aspects involved in presenting two independent legal systems as commensurable. The author concludes that a terminological transfer, be it with the intention of explaining Islamic legal concepts to a non-specialized reader, be it with the intention to reconcile between both systems, cannot do justice to either one of the legal systems.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 19-46 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Asian Journal of Social Science |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 1 2007 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- International law
- International relations
- Islamic law
- Siyar
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)