TY - JOUR
T1 - Intravenous Doxycycline, Azithromycin, or Both for Severe Scrub Typhus
AU - INTREST Trial Investigators
AU - Varghese, George M.
AU - Dayanand, Divya
AU - Gunasekaran, Karthik
AU - Kundu, Debasree
AU - Wyawahare, Mukta
AU - Sharma, Navneet
AU - Chaudhry, Dhruva
AU - Mahajan, Sanjay K.
AU - Saravu, Kavitha
AU - Aruldhas, Blessed W.
AU - Mathew, Binu S.
AU - Nair, Roshini G.
AU - Newbigging, Nalini
AU - Mathew, Aswathy
AU - Abhilash, Kundavaram P.P.
AU - Biswal, Manisha
AU - Prasad, Ann H.
AU - Zachariah, Anand
AU - Iyadurai, Ramya
AU - Hansdak, Samuel G.
AU - Sathyendra, Sowmya
AU - Sudarsanam, Thambu D.
AU - Prakash, John A.J.
AU - Manesh, Abi
AU - Mohan, Alladi
AU - Tarning, Joel
AU - Blacksell, Stuart D.
AU - Peerawaranun, Pimnara
AU - Waithira, Naomi
AU - Mukaka, Mavuto
AU - Cheah, Phaik Yeong
AU - Peter, John V.
AU - Abraham, Ooriapadickal C.
AU - Day, Nicholas P.J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by a grant (IA/CPHS/16/1/502679) from the DBT– Wellcome Trust India Alliance ( India Alliance ) and by a grant (220211/Z/20/Z) from the Wellcome Trust.
Funding Information:
An independent data and safety monitoring board oversaw and periodically reviewed the safety and efficacy of the trial data (Section S1C). The trial drugs were purchased from manufacturers, including intravenous doxycycline (Doxific, Gufic Biosciences), intravenous azithromycin (Azee, Cipla), and placebo multivitamin (Polybion, Merck). The trial was funded by the DBT–Wellcome Trust India Alliance (India Alliance) and the Wellcome Trust, which along with the drug manufacturers had no input into the trial design or conduct, analysis of the data, or writing of the manuscript. The contributions of the authors are described in the . All the authors critically reviewed and provided input into drafts of the manuscript and made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors vouch for the completeness and accuracy of the data and for the fidelity of the trial to the protocol.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: The appropriate antibiotic treatment for severe scrub typhus, a neglected but widespread reemerging zoonotic infection, is unclear. Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy of intravenous doxycycline, azithromycin, or a combination of both in treating severe scrub typhus. Patients who were 15 years of age or older with severe scrub typhus with at least one organ involvement were enrolled. The patients were assigned to receive a 7-day course of intravenous doxycycline, azithromycin, or both (combination therapy). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause at day 28, persistent complications at day 7, and persistent fever at day 5. Results: Among 794 patients (median age, 48 years) who were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, complications included those that were respiratory (in 62%), hepatic (in 54%), cardiovascular (in 42%), renal (in 30%), and neurologic (in 20%). The use of combination therapy resulted in a lower incidence of the composite primary outcome than the use of doxycycline (33% and 47%, respectively), for a risk difference of -13.3 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -21.6 to -5.1; P=0.002). The incidence with combination therapy was also lower than that with azithromycin (48%), for a risk difference of -14.8 percentage points (95% CI, -23.1 to -6.5; P<0.001). No significant difference was seen between the azithromycin and doxycycline groups (risk difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.0 to 10.0; P=0.73). The results in the per-protocol analysis were similar to those in the primary analysis. Adverse events and 28-day mortality were similar in the three groups. Conclusions: Combination therapy with intravenous doxycycline and azithromycin was a better therapeutic option for the treatment of severe scrub typhus than monotherapy with either drug alone.
AB - Background: The appropriate antibiotic treatment for severe scrub typhus, a neglected but widespread reemerging zoonotic infection, is unclear. Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy of intravenous doxycycline, azithromycin, or a combination of both in treating severe scrub typhus. Patients who were 15 years of age or older with severe scrub typhus with at least one organ involvement were enrolled. The patients were assigned to receive a 7-day course of intravenous doxycycline, azithromycin, or both (combination therapy). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause at day 28, persistent complications at day 7, and persistent fever at day 5. Results: Among 794 patients (median age, 48 years) who were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, complications included those that were respiratory (in 62%), hepatic (in 54%), cardiovascular (in 42%), renal (in 30%), and neurologic (in 20%). The use of combination therapy resulted in a lower incidence of the composite primary outcome than the use of doxycycline (33% and 47%, respectively), for a risk difference of -13.3 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -21.6 to -5.1; P=0.002). The incidence with combination therapy was also lower than that with azithromycin (48%), for a risk difference of -14.8 percentage points (95% CI, -23.1 to -6.5; P<0.001). No significant difference was seen between the azithromycin and doxycycline groups (risk difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.0 to 10.0; P=0.73). The results in the per-protocol analysis were similar to those in the primary analysis. Adverse events and 28-day mortality were similar in the three groups. Conclusions: Combination therapy with intravenous doxycycline and azithromycin was a better therapeutic option for the treatment of severe scrub typhus than monotherapy with either drug alone.
KW - Bacterial Infections
KW - Global Health
KW - Infectious Disease
KW - Infectious Disease General
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149427966&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85149427966&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa2208449
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa2208449
M3 - Article
C2 - 36856615
AN - SCOPUS:85149427966
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 388
SP - 792
EP - 803
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 9
ER -