TY - JOUR
T1 - Framework to compare the model generation methods
AU - Bouhaouel, Rim
AU - Kraïem, Naoufel
AU - Salinesi, Camile
AU - Al-khanjari, Zuhoor
AU - Ouali, Sami
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Asian Network for Scientific Information.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The Model Driven Engineering (MDE) needs to abstract with different levels the specification or the solution needed to construct a system and represent it in a model. Our study aims to generate fragments of UML diagrams by using the software product line. To outline our contributions, we need to acquire a thorough knowledge of similar methods using models generation. Therefore, in this study we propose a framework to compare model generation methods using the four worlds framework namely: Nature, system, usage and development. We use it to compare four methods of model generation: FUML, UMLAUT, RSM, FUJABA and to represent the contributions of our study.
AB - The Model Driven Engineering (MDE) needs to abstract with different levels the specification or the solution needed to construct a system and represent it in a model. Our study aims to generate fragments of UML diagrams by using the software product line. To outline our contributions, we need to acquire a thorough knowledge of similar methods using models generation. Therefore, in this study we propose a framework to compare model generation methods using the four worlds framework namely: Nature, system, usage and development. We use it to compare four methods of model generation: FUML, UMLAUT, RSM, FUJABA and to represent the contributions of our study.
KW - Comparison framework
KW - MDE
KW - Model
KW - UML
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918515676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918515676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3923/ajsr.2015.54.66
DO - 10.3923/ajsr.2015.54.66
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84918515676
SN - 1992-1454
VL - 8
SP - 54
EP - 66
JO - Asian Journal of Scientific Research
JF - Asian Journal of Scientific Research
IS - 1
ER -