TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrasting Features and Volcanostratigraphy of the Mafic-Hosted Mandoos and Shinas Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits, Samail Ophiolite, Oman
AU - Cravinho, André
AU - Jesus, Ana P.
AU - Moreira, Bruno
AU - Mateus, António
AU - Pracejus, Bernhard
AU - Figueiras, Jorge
AU - Benoit, Mathieu
AU - Bauer, Wilfried
AU - Rocha, Fernando
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY-NC license.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Despite the substantial amount of research on the Cretaceous Samail ophiolite in Oman, the factors controlling the size and metal endowment of the mafic-hosted, Cu-Au(-Zn-Ag) volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits remain elusive. This work shows that the volcanostratigraphic position, hydrothermal venting style, and oxidation processes are critical factors controlling the distinct features of the Shinas and Mandoos deposits. Mandoos is a large (8 Mt, 1.8 wt % Cu, 0.18 g/ton Au) orebody preserving abundant primary vent-related features formed via mound growth and collapse within a wide hydrothermal field, overlying a poorly developed stockwork. The smaller Shinas deposit (0.8 Mt, 2.6 wt % Cu, 0.63 g/t Au) represents a higher-temperature system evolving from low ƒS2/ƒO2 conditions, locally sealed by jaspers, to a mound growth stage with widespread subseafloor brecciation/replacement with associated zone refining. Mandoos formed at the onset of the postaxial stage (Geotimes-Tholeiitic Alley transition), and Shinas is hosted within the Alley units. Volcanism in Samail was seemingly continuous, and the low eNd and Nb/Ta of the Shinas hanging-wall lavas record the onset of significant modifications of the mantle source during the postaxial stage. Mandoos is enriched in Te + As + Se ± Zn ± Ga ± Sb relative to Shinas, where higher Cu + Au + Tl ± Mo grades possibly reflect leaching of protoarc-like lavas. Rare earth element patterns in the ores mimicking the deposit footwall can be employed to constrain volcanostratigraphic positioning and indicate that the footwall lavas may also represent a source of metals. Formation of metal-rich ochres at the sea floor likely led to Cu + Au upgrading in the ores during seawater-induced oxidation, which was enhanced during subaerial gossan formation.
AB - Despite the substantial amount of research on the Cretaceous Samail ophiolite in Oman, the factors controlling the size and metal endowment of the mafic-hosted, Cu-Au(-Zn-Ag) volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits remain elusive. This work shows that the volcanostratigraphic position, hydrothermal venting style, and oxidation processes are critical factors controlling the distinct features of the Shinas and Mandoos deposits. Mandoos is a large (8 Mt, 1.8 wt % Cu, 0.18 g/ton Au) orebody preserving abundant primary vent-related features formed via mound growth and collapse within a wide hydrothermal field, overlying a poorly developed stockwork. The smaller Shinas deposit (0.8 Mt, 2.6 wt % Cu, 0.63 g/t Au) represents a higher-temperature system evolving from low ƒS2/ƒO2 conditions, locally sealed by jaspers, to a mound growth stage with widespread subseafloor brecciation/replacement with associated zone refining. Mandoos formed at the onset of the postaxial stage (Geotimes-Tholeiitic Alley transition), and Shinas is hosted within the Alley units. Volcanism in Samail was seemingly continuous, and the low eNd and Nb/Ta of the Shinas hanging-wall lavas record the onset of significant modifications of the mantle source during the postaxial stage. Mandoos is enriched in Te + As + Se ± Zn ± Ga ± Sb relative to Shinas, where higher Cu + Au + Tl ± Mo grades possibly reflect leaching of protoarc-like lavas. Rare earth element patterns in the ores mimicking the deposit footwall can be employed to constrain volcanostratigraphic positioning and indicate that the footwall lavas may also represent a source of metals. Formation of metal-rich ochres at the sea floor likely led to Cu + Au upgrading in the ores during seawater-induced oxidation, which was enhanced during subaerial gossan formation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165212725&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165212725&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5382/econgeo.5006
DO - 10.5382/econgeo.5006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85165212725
SN - 0361-0128
VL - 118
SP - 1085
EP - 1124
JO - Economic Geology
JF - Economic Geology
IS - 5
ER -