TY - JOUR
T1 - Continuity of care
T2 - Literature review and implications
AU - Alazri, Mohammed
AU - Heywood, Philip
AU - Neal, Richard D.
AU - Leese, Brenda
N1 - Funding Information:
The author would like to express great thanks to Sultan Qaboos University for sponsoring his post-graduate education in the UK. Also, he would like to thank his supervisors who are co-authors of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY.
PY - 2007/12
Y1 - 2007/12
N2 - Continuity of care is widely regarded as a core value of primary care. The objective of this article is to explore the literature about the concept of continuity of care focusing on factors that influence continuity; advantages and disadvantages of continuity and the effect of continuity on outcomes, hence on the quality of care. Electronic databases and other websites were searched for relevant literature. The results of this review showed that continuity of care is influenced by demographic factors, factors related to patients and healthcare professionals, patient-healthcare professional relationship, inter-professional factors, role of receptionists and organisational factors. Several advantages were found to be associated with most types of continuity in various medical disciplines preventive medicine, general health, maternity and child health, mental and psychosocial health, chronic diseases and costs of care. Various factors influenced different types of continuity. Most types of continuity were associated with good outcomes, hence indirectly affecting the quality of care. Health care professionals and policy makers should be aware of the effect of continuity on quality of care and of the factors that influence continuity if they wish to preserve it as a core value of primary care.
AB - Continuity of care is widely regarded as a core value of primary care. The objective of this article is to explore the literature about the concept of continuity of care focusing on factors that influence continuity; advantages and disadvantages of continuity and the effect of continuity on outcomes, hence on the quality of care. Electronic databases and other websites were searched for relevant literature. The results of this review showed that continuity of care is influenced by demographic factors, factors related to patients and healthcare professionals, patient-healthcare professional relationship, inter-professional factors, role of receptionists and organisational factors. Several advantages were found to be associated with most types of continuity in various medical disciplines preventive medicine, general health, maternity and child health, mental and psychosocial health, chronic diseases and costs of care. Various factors influenced different types of continuity. Most types of continuity were associated with good outcomes, hence indirectly affecting the quality of care. Health care professionals and policy makers should be aware of the effect of continuity on quality of care and of the factors that influence continuity if they wish to preserve it as a core value of primary care.
KW - Continuity of care
KW - General Practitioner
KW - Literature review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882807832&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882807832&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84882807832
SN - 2075-051X
VL - 7
SP - 197
EP - 206
JO - Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal
JF - Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal
IS - 3
ER -