Comparison of conventional and conservation rice-wheat systems in Punjab, Pakistan

Ahmad Nawaz, Muhammad Farooq*, Rattan Lal, Abdul Rehman, Hafeez-ur-Rehman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)


Adoption of resource conservation technologies such as direct seeded aerobic rice (DSAR) and no-till wheat (NTW) seems to be a farmer and ecofriendly option to sustain the productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping systems (RWCS) on long term basis. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of conventional and conservation rice-wheat cropping systems on soil properties, grain yield, and water/system productivities established at two experimental sites (Nankana Sahib and Sheikhupura). There were two rice production systems viz. DSAR, and puddled transplanted flooded rice (PudTR). After rice harvest, wheat was planted after plough tillage (PTW) or through no-till. The study was repeated over time and space. At both sites, higher total nitrogen (N), soil organic carbon (SOC), soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and soil microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) were recorded in DSAR than PudTR. The DSAR yielded 3.8 Mg ha−1, against 3.6 Mg ha−1 in PudTR at Sheikhupura, while the similar paddy yield of 4.2 Mg ha−1 was harvested in DSAR and PudTR at Nankana Sahib. Overall, the adoption of DSAR saved 19% water compared with PudTR. Net benefits of US $729 and 601 ha−1 were obtained from DSAR, against US $604 and 403 ha−1 in PudTR, at Nankana Sahib and Sheikhupura, respectively. The highest water productivity of 3.01 and 3.43 kg ha−1 mm−1 was recorded in DSAR compared to 2.41 and 2.50 kg ha−1 mm−1 in PudTR at Nankana Sahib and Sheikhupura, respectively. The performance of wheat was better when grown after DSAR than PudTR for both experimental sites during both years. The higher total N (0.32 g kg−1), SOC (3.75 g kg−1), soil MBC (165 μg g−1) and soil MBN (611.4 μg g−1) were recorded for DSAR-NTW at both sites. The system productivity (output: input ratio) was 1.89 for DSAR-PTW at Nankana Sahib, and 1.87 for DSAR-NTW at Sheikhupura. In conclusion, DSAR followed by NTW was the best resource conservation technology to sustain the productivity of RWCS, and improve the net profit and the soil properties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-43
Number of pages9
JournalSoil and Tillage Research
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2017


  • Resource conservation technologies
  • Rice-wheat cropping system
  • Soil properties
  • System productivity
  • Water use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science
  • Earth-Surface Processes


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of conventional and conservation rice-wheat systems in Punjab, Pakistan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this