TY - JOUR
T1 - Simultaneous Quantification of Soil Phosphorus Labile Pool and Desorption Kinetics Using DGTs and 3D-DIFS
AU - Menezes-Blackburn, Daniel
AU - Sun, Jiahui
AU - Lehto, Niklas J.
AU - Zhang, Hao
AU - Stutter, Marc
AU - Giles, Courtney D.
AU - Darch, Tegan
AU - George, Timothy S.
AU - Shand, Charles
AU - Lumsdon, David
AU - Blackwell, Martin
AU - Wearing, Catherine
AU - Cooper, Patricia
AU - Wendler, Renate
AU - Brown, Lawrie
AU - Al-Kasbi, Mohammed
AU - Haygarth, Philip M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was performed as part of the Organic Phosphorus Utilisation in Soils (OPUS) project, funded by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) responsive mode grant (BB/K018167/1) in the UK to explore cropping strategies to target the use of recalcitrant soil Po. The James Hutton Institute receives financial support from the Rural & Environment Science & Analytical Services Division of the Scottish Government. The first author received financial support from Sultan Qaboos University through the Deanship of Research (project RF/AGR/SWAE/18/01).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2019/6/18
Y1 - 2019/6/18
N2 - The buffering of phosphorus concentrations in soil solution by the soil-solid phase is an important process for providing plant root access to nutrients. Accordingly, the size of labile solid phase-bound phosphorus pool and the rate at which it can resupply phosphorous into the dissolved phase can be important variables in determining when the plant availability of the nutrient may be limited. The phosphorus labile pool (Plabile) and its desorption kinetics were simultaneously evaluated in 10 agricultural UK soils using the diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) technique. The DGT-induced fluxes in the soil and sediments model (DIFS) was fitted to the time series of DGT deployments (1-240 h), which allowed the estimation of Plabile, and the system response time (Tc). The Plabile concentration was then compared to that obtained by several soil P extracts including Olsen P, FeO-P, and water extractable P, in order to assess if the data from these analytical procedures can be used to represent the labile P across different soils. The Olsen P concentration, commonly used as a representation of the soil labile P pool, overestimated the desorbable P concentration by 6-fold. The use of this approach for the quantification of soil P desorption kinetic parameters found a wide range of equally valid solutions for Tc. Additionally, the performance of different DIFS model versions working in different dimensions (1D, 2D, and 3D) was compared. Although all models could provide a good fit to the experimental DGT time series data, the fitted parameters showed a poor agreement between different model versions. The limitations of the DIFS model family are associated with the assumptions taken in the modeling approach and the three-dimensional (3D) version is here considered to be the most precise among them.
AB - The buffering of phosphorus concentrations in soil solution by the soil-solid phase is an important process for providing plant root access to nutrients. Accordingly, the size of labile solid phase-bound phosphorus pool and the rate at which it can resupply phosphorous into the dissolved phase can be important variables in determining when the plant availability of the nutrient may be limited. The phosphorus labile pool (Plabile) and its desorption kinetics were simultaneously evaluated in 10 agricultural UK soils using the diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) technique. The DGT-induced fluxes in the soil and sediments model (DIFS) was fitted to the time series of DGT deployments (1-240 h), which allowed the estimation of Plabile, and the system response time (Tc). The Plabile concentration was then compared to that obtained by several soil P extracts including Olsen P, FeO-P, and water extractable P, in order to assess if the data from these analytical procedures can be used to represent the labile P across different soils. The Olsen P concentration, commonly used as a representation of the soil labile P pool, overestimated the desorbable P concentration by 6-fold. The use of this approach for the quantification of soil P desorption kinetic parameters found a wide range of equally valid solutions for Tc. Additionally, the performance of different DIFS model versions working in different dimensions (1D, 2D, and 3D) was compared. Although all models could provide a good fit to the experimental DGT time series data, the fitted parameters showed a poor agreement between different model versions. The limitations of the DIFS model family are associated with the assumptions taken in the modeling approach and the three-dimensional (3D) version is here considered to be the most precise among them.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067055771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067055771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.9b00320
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.9b00320
M3 - Article
C2 - 31083927
AN - SCOPUS:85067055771
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 53
SP - 6718
EP - 6728
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 12
ER -