TY - JOUR
T1 - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ERGR-EMHC ROUTING PROTOCOL USING LSWTS AND 3DUL LOCALIZATION SCHEMES IN UWSNS
AU - Al-Salti, Faiza
AU - Alzeidi, N.
AU - Day, Khaled
AU - Touzene, Abderezak
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by The Research Council (TRC) research grant number RC/SCI/COMP/15/02.
Funding Information:
This work is supported by The Research Council (TRC) of the Sultanate of Oman under the research grant number RC/SCI/COMP/15/02.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023,International Journal of Computer Networks and Communications. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - This paper studies the impact of different localization schemes on the performance of location-based routing for UWSNs. Particularly, LSWTS and 3DUL localization schemes available in the literature are used to study their effects on the performance of the ERGR-EMHC routing protocol. First, we assess the performance of two localization schemes by measuring their localization coverage, accuracy, control packets overhead, and required localization time. We then study the performance of the ERGR-EMHC protocol using location information provided by the selected localization schemes. The results are compared with the performance of the routing protocol when using exact nodes’ locations. The obtained results show that LSWTS outperforms 3DUL in terms of localization accuracy by 83% and localization overhead by 70%. In addition, the results indicate that the localization error has a significant impact on the performance of the routing protocol. For instance, ERGR-EMHC with LSWTS is better in delivering data packets by an average of 175% compared to 3DUL.
AB - This paper studies the impact of different localization schemes on the performance of location-based routing for UWSNs. Particularly, LSWTS and 3DUL localization schemes available in the literature are used to study their effects on the performance of the ERGR-EMHC routing protocol. First, we assess the performance of two localization schemes by measuring their localization coverage, accuracy, control packets overhead, and required localization time. We then study the performance of the ERGR-EMHC protocol using location information provided by the selected localization schemes. The results are compared with the performance of the routing protocol when using exact nodes’ locations. The obtained results show that LSWTS outperforms 3DUL in terms of localization accuracy by 83% and localization overhead by 70%. In addition, the results indicate that the localization error has a significant impact on the performance of the routing protocol. For instance, ERGR-EMHC with LSWTS is better in delivering data packets by an average of 175% compared to 3DUL.
KW - Underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs)
KW - localization
KW - localization error
KW - location-based routing
KW - ranging localization methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151560986&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85151560986&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4e38c117-6424-30cc-a772-cf02302033f7/
U2 - 10.5121/ijcnc.2023.15201
DO - 10.5121/ijcnc.2023.15201
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85151560986
SN - 0975-2293
VL - 15
JO - International Journal of Computer Networks and Communications
JF - International Journal of Computer Networks and Communications
IS - 2
ER -