TY - GEN
T1 - Identifying Real and Posed Smiles from Observers’ Galvanic Skin Response and Blood Volume Pulse
AU - Gao, Renshang
AU - Islam, Atiqul
AU - Gedeon, Tom
AU - Hossain, Md Zakir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This study addresses the question whether galvanic skin response (GSR) and blood volume pulse (BVP) of untrained and unaided observers can be used to identify real and posed smiles from different sets of smile videos or smile images. Observers were shown smile face videos/images, either singly or paired, with the intention to recognise each viewed as real or posed smiles. We created four experimental situations, namely single images (SI), single videos (SV), paired images (PI), and paired videos (PV). The GSR and BVP signals were recorded and processed. Our machine learning classifiers reached the highest accuracy of 93.3%, 87.6%, 92.0%, 91.7% for PV, PI, SV, and SI respectively. Finally, PV and SI were found to be the easiest and hardest way to identify real and posed smiles respectively. Overall, we demonstrated that observers’ subconscious physiological signals (GSR and BVP) are able to identify real and posed smiles at a good accuracy.
AB - This study addresses the question whether galvanic skin response (GSR) and blood volume pulse (BVP) of untrained and unaided observers can be used to identify real and posed smiles from different sets of smile videos or smile images. Observers were shown smile face videos/images, either singly or paired, with the intention to recognise each viewed as real or posed smiles. We created four experimental situations, namely single images (SI), single videos (SV), paired images (PI), and paired videos (PV). The GSR and BVP signals were recorded and processed. Our machine learning classifiers reached the highest accuracy of 93.3%, 87.6%, 92.0%, 91.7% for PV, PI, SV, and SI respectively. Finally, PV and SI were found to be the easiest and hardest way to identify real and posed smiles respectively. Overall, we demonstrated that observers’ subconscious physiological signals (GSR and BVP) are able to identify real and posed smiles at a good accuracy.
KW - Affective computing
KW - Classification
KW - Machine learning
KW - Physiological signals
KW - Smile
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097039824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097039824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-63830-6_32
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-63830-6_32
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85097039824
SN - 9783030638290
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 375
EP - 386
BT - Neural Information Processing - 27th International Conference, ICONIP 2020, Proceedings
A2 - Yang, Haiqin
A2 - Pasupa, Kitsuchart
A2 - Leung, Andrew Chi-Sing
A2 - Kwok, James T.
A2 - Chan, Jonathan H.
A2 - King, Irwin
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, ICONIP 2020
Y2 - 18 November 2020 through 22 November 2020
ER -