TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive styles, gender, and student academic performance in engineering education
AU - Alalouch, Chaham
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Sultan Qaboos University for its continuous encouragement and support towards research activities, and we extend our gratitude to all students and instructors who supported this work. The survey used in this study obtained the approval of the Sultan Qaboos University VC’s Advisor for Academic Affairs on 20 April 2017.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Cognitive styles affect the learning process positively if tasks are matched to the cognitive style of learners. This effect becomes more pronounced in complex education, such as in engineering. We attempted to critically assess the effect of cognitive styles and gender on students’ academic performance in eight engineering majors to understand whether a cognitive style preference is associated with certain majors. We used the Cognitive Style Indicator (CoSI) with a sample of n = 584 engineering students. Multiple standard statistical tests, regression tree analysis, and cluster analysis showed that none of the three cognitive styles was exclusively associated with better performance. However, students who had a stronger preference for a cognitive style were more likely to perform better. Gender, the major, and students’ clarity about their cognitive style were shown to be the best predictors of academic performance. Female students performed better and were clearer about their preferred cognitive style, whereas male students were more capable of adapting to different learning tasks. Furthermore, certain engineering majors were shown to be associated with certain cognitive styles. We concluded the study with theoretical and practical implications for engineering education and suggestions for further research.
AB - Cognitive styles affect the learning process positively if tasks are matched to the cognitive style of learners. This effect becomes more pronounced in complex education, such as in engineering. We attempted to critically assess the effect of cognitive styles and gender on students’ academic performance in eight engineering majors to understand whether a cognitive style preference is associated with certain majors. We used the Cognitive Style Indicator (CoSI) with a sample of n = 584 engineering students. Multiple standard statistical tests, regression tree analysis, and cluster analysis showed that none of the three cognitive styles was exclusively associated with better performance. However, students who had a stronger preference for a cognitive style were more likely to perform better. Gender, the major, and students’ clarity about their cognitive style were shown to be the best predictors of academic performance. Female students performed better and were clearer about their preferred cognitive style, whereas male students were more capable of adapting to different learning tasks. Furthermore, certain engineering majors were shown to be associated with certain cognitive styles. We concluded the study with theoretical and practical implications for engineering education and suggestions for further research.
KW - CoSI
KW - Cognitive style indicator
KW - Cognitive theories
KW - Engineering pedagogy
KW - Higher education
KW - Oman
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114744408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114744408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/educsci11090502
DO - 10.3390/educsci11090502
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114744408
SN - 2227-7102
VL - 11
JO - Education Sciences
JF - Education Sciences
IS - 9
M1 - 502
ER -