Antecedents and consequences of psychological contracts: Does organizational culture really matter?

Orlando C. Richard*, Amy McMillan-Capehart, Shahid N. Bhuian, Edward C. Taylor

*المؤلف المقابل لهذا العمل

نتاج البحث: المساهمة في مجلةArticleمراجعة النظراء

60 اقتباسات (Scopus)

ملخص

Exploring the role of psychological contracts, this study proposes that different organizational cultures are associated with relational psychological contracts compared to transactional contracts while both types of contracts serve as mediators. While clan cultures positively impact relational contracts and are negatively associated with transactional contracts, hierarchical cultures have the reverse effect. In addition, psychological contract types mediate the two culture types' relationship to both organizational commitment and employee yearly earnings. In sum, clan cultures relate to more positive organizational outcomes than hierarchical cultures, a finding which as implications for future research and practice.

اللغة الأصليةEnglish
الصفحات (من إلى)818-825
عدد الصفحات8
دوريةJournal of Business Research
مستوى الصوت62
رقم الإصدار8
المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء
حالة النشرPublished - أغسطس 2009
منشور خارجيًانعم

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • ???subjectarea.asjc.1400.1406???

بصمة

أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Antecedents and consequences of psychological contracts: Does organizational culture really matter?'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.

قم بذكر هذا