Unlocking the potentials of depleted gas fields: A numerical evaluation of underground CO2 storage and geothermal energy harvesting

Amrou Al-Alawi, Mingjie Chen*, El Hadi Mazouz, Tartil Al-Abri, Usman Taura, Mohammad Reza Nikoo, Ali Al-Maktoumi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Using partial underground CO2 storage as a working agent to harvest geothermal energy is a promising carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) method. It is particularly economically feasible to use or retrofit the existing infrastructure of a hydrocarbon field. Although technical advantages of integrated CO2 sequestration and CO2-circulated geothermal harvest using depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs have been reported, quantitative evaluations of economic benefits using existing wells of realistic reservoirs are rare. In this study, a 3-D hydrothermal flow model is built for the Triassic Argilo-Gréseux Supérieur (TAGS) Formation of the Toual gas field, Algeria using Schlumberger Petrel and CMG-STARS software. A three-phase operational scheme is proposed for sequential CO2 sequestration and CO2-circulated geothermal extraction over 100 years. The first phase is injecting CO2 for 30 years, followed by concurrent cold CO2 injection and hot CO2 extraction in the developed CO2 plume (circulation) for 40 years as the second phase. In the third phase, producing wells in the second phase are converted to injection wells while outer wells start to extract hot CO2 for another 30 years. Scenario 1 is simulated using the selected nine existing wells of the field, while an optimized Scenario 2 is designed and simulated by adding seven newly drilled wells in addition to the existing wells. Scenario 3 shares the same numerical simulation of Scenario 1, but assumes the selected nine existing wells are newly drilled for the economic evaluation. Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), Net Present Value (NPV), and Return on Investment (ROI) are used as economic indicators. The results demonstrate that Scenario 2, which combines the use of existing and newly drilled wells, yields improved economic metrics compared to Scenario 1: 0.97 USD/MWh vs. 1.54 USD/MWh for LCOE and $2.9M vs. $1.1M for NPV. Both scenarios represent profitable endeavors, with ROI values of 1.3 % and 1.5 %, respectively. In contrast, Scenario 3 represents the worst-case scenario, with the highest LCOE at 2.90 USD/MWh and the lowest NPV and ROI at -$0.4M and -0.2 %, respectively. The negative NPV and ROI in Scenario 3 indicates that CO2-circulated geothermal harvesting in aquifers or giant depleted hydrocarbon fields, without leveraging existing infrastructure, is economically infeasible.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100395
JournalEnergy Geoscience
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • CO geological storage
  • Depleted gas field
  • Geothermal harvest
  • Levelized cost of energy (LCOE)
  • Net present value (NPV)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Geophysics
  • Energy (miscellaneous)
  • Geology

Cite this